*****************************************************************************
* FIEND'S SUPERBEAR MARKET
REPORT *
* February 11,
2026 *
* *
* e-mail:
fiendbear@fiendbear.com
*
* web
address: http://www.fiendbear.com *
*****************************************************************************
Fiend Commentary
================
Silver’s
Shakeout: How 1980 and 2011 Compare to Today
Gold is
still holding above the psychologically important $5,000 level, and silver is
still holding the low-$80s after last week’s brutal drop. That matters because
the first real test of any parabolic move is not the peak. It’s what happens
after the first air pocket.
So far, this
“shakeout” is violent, but it doesn’t yet resemble the classic silver collapses
of 1980 or 2011 where the market didn’t just correct, it broke down into a
long, demoralizing retreat.
A quick look
back puts today’s action in perspective.
1.
1980: the true historical “collapse”
Silver’s 1980 episode wasn’t simply an overheated chart. It was a full-blown
corner attempt colliding with leverage, margin pressure, and rule changes.
After silver ran up to about $49.45 an ounce in mid-January 1980, it imploded
over the following weeks. On “Silver Thursday” (March 27, 1980), Britannica
notes silver fell to $10.80 in a single plunge. That is the blueprint of a
structural break: nearly an 80% wipeout from the peak, and it damaged more than
just speculators.
The point:
1980 was a regime change, not a routine correction.
2.
2011: a modern “margin and momentum” unwind
The 2011 peak had a different feel: less corner, more momentum and crowding.
Silver ran to roughly $49.85 in late April 2011 and then dropped to about
$34.95 within days as margin requirements were raised and speculative fever
cooled. That is the pattern of a frothy market getting deflated quickly: fast
drop, forced selling, and then a longer period where
the market struggled to regain its footing.
The point:
2011 looked like a momentum bubble meeting the real world.
3.
2026: the first big break… followed by buyers showing up
Last week’s drop clearly belongs in the “historic volatility” category.
Euronews reported silver fell 31% on Friday, and gold slid sharply off a record
high. But what’s different so far is what happened next: instead of continuing
to cascade lower day after day, the metals found a bid again. Wednesday’s trade
has gold back around $5,050 and silver around $82, helped by a fresh dip in
Treasury yields after weak retail sales data hinted the consumer may be
cooling.
In other
words, this looks more like “violent de-leveraging” than “end of story.”
Why might
there be more support this time?
None of that
guarantees higher prices. But it helps explain why the market is not behaving
like it did after the 1980 or 2011 peaks—at least not
yet.
Stocks and
bonds are also telling a “split-screen” story
What to
watch next
The next few reports matter more than usual because the market is trying to
answer one big question: was last week’s metals smash a “top,” or just a
leverage flush inside a larger uptrend?
Here are the
tells:
Bottom line:
this is not 1980—yet. It’s not even clearly 2011—yet. But we are now in the phase where metals are no longer a smooth trend; they’re
a referendum on confidence, currency, and whether policy will have to turn
easier again as spring approaches.
Weekly Market Summary Page
[Return to the Fiend's SuperBear Page]