*****************************************************************************

* FIEND'S SUPERBEAR MARKET REPORT *

* August 28, 2026 *

* *

* e-mail: fiendbear@fiendbear.com *

* web address: http://www.fiendbear.com *

*****************************************************************************

Fiend Commentary
================

Silver at $70, the Long Bond at 5.2%

Thursday produced two very different pictures of confidence.

The Nasdaq jumped 1.6% and moved close to its record as Nvidia, Salesforce and other technology leaders surged. The VIX fell toward 14.5, showing that investors see very little near-term danger. At the same time, silver pushed against the important $70 resistance area, gold held above $4,600, and the 30-year Treasury yield remained close to 5.2%. Oil also stayed above $83 despite months of intermittent ceasefires and diplomatic promises.

These markets may appear to be telling contradictory stories. Stocks are pricing continuing growth and abundant liquidity. Metals are pricing inflation, fiscal strain and a central bank unlikely to tighten aggressively. Long bonds are demanding historically high compensation for lending money to Washington.

There may be one belief connecting all three: the Fed will keep talking about inflation without doing enough to stop it.

Silver Tests the Fed’s Credibility

Silver gained more than 2% Thursday and settled around $69.43, once again approaching the $70 level that has repeatedly stopped prior rallies. Gold finished near $4,610. Both metals have recovered dramatically since the market concluded that Kevin Warsh’s hawkish language was not being followed by hawkish action.

The Fed did not cut rates. It did not promise cuts. It simply held rates steady while the probability of future hikes steadily declined. That was enough to change the metals trade.

Gold and silver had been crushed when investors believed Warsh might become a genuine inflation fighter. As that belief faded, the metals recovered. They do not require immediate easy money. They need only a growing conviction that inflation will remain above target while the Fed avoids imposing the economic and political pain necessary to bring it down quickly.

Silver’s next move may be especially revealing. A convincing break above $70 would suggest that the market is no longer treating the recent recovery as merely a bounce from oversold conditions. Failure at the same resistance could produce another pullback, particularly if Warsh sounds unexpectedly hawkish at Jackson Hole.

But words alone may have less effect than they did several months ago. Investors have already heard the promises about 2% inflation. They are beginning to demand evidence that the Fed is prepared to act.

The Hike That Keeps Moving Away

CME FedWatch now places the probability of a September increase at only about 34%, while the probability of at least one hike by December remains around 74%. The September meeting is scheduled for September 15–16, followed by October 27–28 and December 8–9.

October has recently been close to a coin toss. That may still overstate the likelihood of action. If the Fed remains unchanged in September, the next meeting will come only days before the November 3 midterm elections. A pre-election increase would be politically explosive under a president who has repeatedly demanded lower rates.

A symbolic quarter-point increase in December, after the election, looks more plausible. Such a move would allow Warsh to claim that the Fed remains committed to price stability without tightening enough to produce an immediate economic shock. JPMorgan’s current base case also calls for the first quarter-point increase in December.

Even that outcome is far from certain. One weak employment report could remove much of the remaining December probability. Another moderate inflation report could give the Fed cover to wait. A deeper stock-market decline or credit disruption would make a hike even harder to justify.

The market has spent 2026 repeatedly moving the expected increase to the next meeting. September replaced July. October may replace September. December may replace October. Eventually, the year can end without any action at all.

That does not mean the Fed has officially turned dovish. It means the threshold for a hike keeps rising, while almost any economic weakness supplies another reason to remain on hold.

The 30-Year Refuses to Cooperate

The long bond is not waiting for the Fed’s decision.

The 30-year Treasury yield ended Thursday near 5.19%, while the 10-year was close to 4.67%. The 30-year has now spent an extended period above 5% and repeatedly returned toward 5.2% despite Treasury’s attempt to support the market through larger bond buybacks.

Treasury doubled the planned size of certain long-duration buybacks from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation after yields reached nineteen-year highs. The announcement produced brief relief, but analysts noted that purchases of that size remain tiny compared with the overall Treasury market and do not address the deficits driving the supply of new debt.

That is why the 30-year yield may be the most honest market price on the board.

Fed-funds futures are trying to predict what twelve policymakers will do at a particular meeting. The long bond must price decades of inflation, deficits, currency risk and future government borrowing. A symbolic quarter-point hike may affect the short end of the yield curve, but it cannot make $40 trillion of federal debt disappear.

If the Fed remains on hold, long-term investors may continue demanding high yields because they believe inflation will be tolerated. If the Fed delivers one token increase, investors may still conclude that the move is too small to alter the fiscal or monetary trajectory.

The Fed can control the overnight rate.

It cannot order thirty-year investors to believe the inflation story.

The Summer of War Became a Bull Market

One of 2026’s strangest outcomes is that the summer war has been broadly favorable for U.S. stocks.

The Nasdaq is again near its all-time high. The S&P 500 is close to a record. The VIX is near the lowest levels of the year. Nvidia and Salesforce provided Thursday’s latest reminder that investors remain willing to swarm into any company that can still present a powerful AI-growth story.

This happened while oil remained elevated through failed ceasefires, tanker incidents, sanctions and continuing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz. WTI settled Thursday at $83.53 and Brent at $89.70 after the Trump administration rejected a return to the earlier Iran agreement.

The market has adapted to the conflict. Gulf exports have improved from their March lows, and oil has remained far below its most extreme panic levels. Every new confrontation is now treated as manageable unless it produces an immediate interruption large enough to change the inflation outlook.

That conditioning has made investors remarkably complacent. The war is unresolved, but the VIX suggests almost no one expects it to disturb stocks materially during the next month.

Perhaps they are right. AI earnings remain powerful, oil flows have partially recovered, and every escalation has eventually produced another diplomatic effort.

But the market is also assuming that the Fed will remain patient, oil will remain contained, bond yields will not rise much further and the final technology leaders will continue delivering extraordinary results. September brings another Fed meeting, inflation reports, employment data, a Bank of Japan decision and continuing geopolitical risk.

A VIX near 14.5 does not mean those risks have vanished. It means protection against them is inexpensive because few investors believe they will matter soon.

Warsh’s Speech and the Larger Test

Warsh’s Jackson Hole address provides another opportunity to restore some inflation credibility.

A genuinely hawkish speech could push September and October probabilities higher, strengthen the dollar and temporarily pressure silver back below $70. But unless Warsh identifies clear conditions under which the Fed will actually raise rates, markets may interpret another tough speech as more jawboning. Reuters noted that his previous reluctance to explain the July hold contributed to the long-bond selloff and continuing uncertainty over the Fed’s reaction function.

The real test will not be whether Warsh uses the word “persistent.”

It will be whether the dollar strengthens and long-term yields fall after he speaks.

If the dollar declines while the 30-year yield rises, investors will be signaling that they expect inflationary accommodation rather than credible restraint. That would probably be supportive for gold and silver even if it created trouble for highly valued stocks.

Silver near $70 and the Nasdaq near a record are not necessarily contradictory. Both can prosper if the market believes the Fed will not tighten meaningfully. Stocks receive continued liquidity and relief from higher-rate fears. Metals receive protection from inflation, debt and eventual currency weakness.

The 30-year Treasury near 5.2% represents the cost of that arrangement.

The Nasdaq says the party can continue.

Silver says the money may buy less.

The long bond says someone will eventually have to pay for both.

---

Weekly Market Summary Page
[Return to the Fiend's SuperBear Page]