*****************************************************************************

* FIEND'S SUPERBEAR MARKET REPORT *

* July 31, 2026 *

* *

* e-mail: fiendbear@fiendbear.com *

* web address: http://www.fiendbear.com *

*****************************************************************************

Fiend Commentary
================

The $450 Billion Mirage

Thursday’s rally looked like a broad vote of confidence in the economy and the stock market.

It was closer to a one-company optical illusion.

The Dow jumped more than 600 points, the S&P 500 gained 1.7%, and the Nasdaq surged 2.8%. Microsoft rose 15.5%, its largest one-day percentage gain since 2008, and added approximately $450 billion in market value—the largest single-day increase ever recorded by a public company. Semiconductor shares followed Microsoft higher, with the chip index gaining more than 8%.

Those are spectacular headline numbers.

The market underneath them was far less impressive.

More than 70% of S&P 500 stocks fell Thursday. The equal-weighted S&P 500 lost approximately 0.8%. Only nine of the Dow’s 30 components advanced, and the S&P 500 excluding technology was also down. In other words, the averages soared while most stocks went backward.

Microsoft did not participate in Thursday’s rally.

Microsoft essentially was Thursday’s rally.

Wall Street Celebrates 1.5% Growth

The economic data gave investors another convenient reason to buy.

Second-quarter GDP grew at an annualized rate of only 1.5%, down from 2.1% in the first quarter. Wall Street interpreted that as exactly the right amount of weakness: slow enough to restrain the Fed, but not yet weak enough to call a recession.

But the internals were not nearly as weak as the headline.

Consumer spending accelerated, and real final sales to private domestic purchasers—a measure of demand excluding government spending, inventories and trade—rose at a 3.9% annual rate. Much of the headline GDP weakness came from imports, which subtract from the calculation even when those imports reflect strong domestic demand for AI equipment and other investment goods.

So the market celebrated weak GDP even though private domestic demand remained relatively strong.

That is important because a resilient consumer and heavy business investment do not necessarily give the Fed an excuse to abandon its inflation concerns. They may do the opposite.

The household picture is also less comfortable than the spending numbers suggest. Personal income increased only 0.2% in June, while the personal saving rate fell to 2.7%, its lowest level since June 2022. Consumers are still spending, but they are saving less to do it.

That can support GDP today while creating vulnerability later.

Temporary Inflation Gets Another Victory Lap

The PCE report was treated as another piece of good news.

Headline PCE inflation slowed from 4.1% in May to 3.7% in June, and the monthly index actually declined 0.1%. But most of that relief came from the plunge in oil and gasoline prices during the short-lived Middle East ceasefire. That ceasefire has since collapsed, Brent crude is back above $90, and average U.S. gasoline prices have risen above $4 again.

The inflation improvement may therefore have arrived just as the conditions producing it were reversing.

Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, still rose 0.1% during June and was up 3.3% from a year earlier. That was slightly lower than May, but it remains nowhere near the Fed’s 2% target. For the entire second quarter, the PCE price index rose at a 5.1% annualized pace, while the broader price index for gross domestic purchases increased 5.7%. Core PCE rose at a 3.4% annualized rate.

That is not price stability.

It is an inflation problem temporarily disguised by lower gasoline prices.

Wall Street is once again assuming that energy prices will do the Fed’s work. If oil falls, headline inflation improves and policymakers can remain patient. If oil rises, the increase will be blamed on the war and called temporary.

Either way, investors find a reason why the Fed should not tighten.

The Bond Market Did Not Join the Celebration

Stocks loved Thursday’s combination of slower growth and slightly cooler headline inflation.

The bond market did not.

The 30-year Treasury yield reached 5.2444%, its highest level since 2007, before finishing around 5.21%. The 10-year yield remained near 4.67%. At the same time, the probability of a September rate hike moved back up to approximately 64%.

That is the market’s central contradiction.

Equity investors saw the economic reports and concluded that the Fed could remain on hold.

Long-term bond investors saw the same reports and demanded even more compensation for inflation, deficits and Fed credibility risk.

The Fed may not raise its overnight rate in September. The market is already raising long-term borrowing costs without it.

A 30-year yield above 5.2% affects mortgages, corporate refinancing, private credit, commercial real estate and the federal interest bill. It also makes extreme stock valuations harder to justify. When investors can earn more than 5% on a long Treasury bond, paying almost any price for distant corporate earnings becomes a much less obvious decision.

Warsh appears willing to let the bond market perform some of the Fed’s tightening. But that is a dangerous strategy if yields are rising because investors believe the Fed is behind the curve rather than ahead of it.

The difference matters.

Higher Yields and a Lower Dollar

The dollar added another unusual signal.

Despite long-term U.S. yields reaching multi-decade highs, the dollar index fell approximately 0.8% to 99.94, breaking below 100. Some of the move came from a sudden surge in the yen and speculation that Japanese authorities had intervened to support their currency. But the dollar was broadly weaker, not merely weaker against the yen.

Normally, higher U.S. yields help the dollar by attracting foreign capital.

When the dollar falls while long yields rise, it can suggest that investors are demanding higher returns because they perceive greater inflation, fiscal or policy risk—not because confidence in the United States is improving.

That interpretation is an inference, but it fits the broader picture.

The Fed held rates steady.
The dollar fell.
The long bond sold off.
Stocks rallied around one giant technology company.

That is not a unified message of confidence.

It is four markets telling four different stories.

One Stock Is Not a Healthy Market

Microsoft’s results may genuinely distinguish it from other AI giants.

Its Azure outlook exceeded expectations, its future capital spending was lower than feared, and management reassured investors that the company can continue generating cash while funding its AI expansion. That is a much better message than the negative free-cash-flow reports recently delivered by Alphabet, Tesla and Meta.

But even excellent results do not turn a one-stock stampede into a broad rally.

Thursday showed how concentrated the market has become. Investors have repeatedly swarmed around whichever giant company still appears to have a flawless story.

First it was Nvidia.
Then SpaceX.
Then Apple reclaimed the market-cap crown.
Now Microsoft has become the trusted AI winner.

The money is not broadly returning to equities. It is crowding into a dwindling number of stocks believed capable of escaping the economy, inflation and the bond market.

That can keep the averages elevated. It can also create extraordinary fragility.

Microsoft added $450 billion in one session. That is more than the entire market value of most major corporations and many national stock markets. The earnings were strong, but a move of that scale also reflects positioning, short covering and fear of missing the next AI surge.

The business may deserve a premium.

The market reaction still looks like speculation.

A Rally Without Confirmation

Thursday recovered much of Wednesday’s Fed-related decline, but it did not repair the market’s internal weakness.

A healthy rally usually brings broad participation. More stocks rise than fall. The equal-weighted indexes confirm the cap-weighted indexes. Cyclical, financial, industrial and smaller companies participate alongside technology.

Thursday delivered the opposite.

The averages rose because the largest stocks carry enormous weight. Most individual stocks declined. The equal-weighted market fell. Long yields remained at multi-decade highs. The dollar weakened. Headline inflation improved because oil temporarily collapsed, even though oil has already rebounded.

That makes Thursday’s rally look less like an economic all-clear and more like a temporary return to the most crowded trade on Wall Street.

Friday will test whether Microsoft can pull the rest of the market higher or whether the gains remain trapped inside a handful of AI and semiconductor names.

The averages may continue rising. Momentum, buybacks and passive flows remain powerful. But every rally that depends on fewer stocks becomes more vulnerable to disappointment from any one of them.

Thursday’s headlines said the market was back.

The breadth said most stocks never arrived.

The bond market said inflation risk remains.

And the dollar said confidence may not be as strong as the Dow and Nasdaq made it appear.

One company gained $450 billion.

That is an extraordinary achievement.

It is not the same thing as a healthy stock market.

---

Weekly Market Summary Page
[Return to the Fiend's SuperBear Page]