Is Fed Chair Powell a Phony or a Fool?

By Victor Sperandeo with the Curmudgeon

 

Introduction:

To listen to Fed Chair Jay Powell, speak, one must have the stoicism of a 75-year-old Buddhist monk. Although Powell said absolutely nothing new, as Bloomberg noted (Stock Markets Don’t Like Listening to Jay Powell) the stock market belly flopped into a waterfall decline as soon as Powell spoke. Since the upcoming Fed Interest rate hikes were so well known, you may wonder why this news gets discounted so many times?

Discussion:

About 15+ years ago, I was approached by a Norway based Quant Hedge Fund that wanted to include KEY WORDS AND DATA into an algorithm which was to be used for “verbal sensitive” computer trading.  I passed, as I didn’t think it could be done.  I was wrong!

In fact, every time Powell mentioned “raising rates” in his interview, the computers sold. Other data, like CPI estimates, are also programmed for buy/sell decisions. The resulting trades are instantaneous. Traders cannot submit on-line orders to keep pace.  The computers are far faster than humans.

Powell is either a phony or a fool?  He cited the tight job market and strong economy as a reason to raise rates. What is he talking about? Yet those are lagging stats! They have no meaning as to whether rate hikes are appropriate in two months. 

Let’s now examine the latest GDP report to show that the economy is not as strong as you might believe. 

First, the +6.9% GDP reported for the 4th quarter of 2021 was primarily due to inventory building rather than final sales. Inventory rebuilding in the 4th quarter surged $173.5 billion, up from a decline of $66.8 billion in the 3rd quarter. That added 4.9 percentage points to the overall GDP gain, accounting for an outsized 71% of GDP growth.  The increase in private inventory investment was led by retail and wholesale trade industries.

Second, the GDP price deflator [1.] was equal to real GDP! The BEA reported, “The price index for gross domestic purchases increased 6.9 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with an increase of 5.6 percent in the third quarter. The PCE price index (the Fed’s favorite inflation gauge) increased 6.5 percent, compared with an increase of 5.3 percent.”

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated

Note 1.
  The GDP price deflator is a more comprehensive inflation measure than the CPI index because it isn't based on a fixed basket of goods.

Lastly, consumer sentiment is declining (68.8% to 67.2% currently) and the economy is slowing (the Atlanta Fed estimate for the 1st Quarter of 2022 is basically flat or + 0.1%).  Yet investment banks are suggesting four to seven interest rates increases this year? Is anyone LOL?

Stock Market Reaction:

The week ended mixed.  The DJI, S&P 500, NDX 100 futures were all up for the week while the Russell 2000, Mid-Caps, Dow Transports, net breadth, A/D cumulative index were all down.  Note that the DJI held its December 1, 2021, closing low, which is a bullish divergence.

The stock market is in an intermediate correction at best, or the first leg down of a bear market. However, there is no bear market confirmation yet.

Talk of Fed Rate Hikes:

Meanwhile, Bank of America jumped on the bandwagon of much higher short term interest rates by forecasting six rate increases this year. So is BNP Paribas.  Those forecasts were topped by Nick Chatters, investment manager at Aegon Asset Management who told the FT, “Based on what Powell said yesterday, there’s a reasonable probability of seven rate hikes this year, one at each meeting. That could cause investors to fall off chairs.”

All that is just talk to lower inflation expectations. I believe there is ZERO chance of even four rate increases this year. I’m still sticking with two rate hikes in 2022 as reiterated here.

Quantitative Tightening, Reverse Repos and Real Tightening:

The amount of decline in risk assets without any actual Fed monetary “tightening” is amazing to witness!  Powell said nothing about raising rates more than 25 bps at a time, how high rates might rise, or how much the Fed balance sheet would run off due to maturing debt not replaced (aka Quantitative Tightening).

The Treasury Department “pays” the Fed at the maturity of the bond by subtracting the sum from the cash balance it keeps on deposit with the Fed, effectively making the money disappear.

The Treasury needs to replenish that cash it “paid” the Fed by selling new bonds. When the Fed dealer banks (but NOT the Fed) buy those bonds they reduce bank reserves, thus draining money from the financial system.  Alternatively, the bank buys the new bond (s) in its "Hold to Maturity" account, in which case no reserves are involved. The money in the financial system stays the same.

Currently, Fed assets are $8,860 trillion, but will be ~ $9.1 trillion in March.  The Fed’s Reverse Repos total $1,615, trillion. As we have stated in many earlier posts like this one, Reverse Repos are a drain of money and reserves on the economy, but the Fed can end them overnight. 

I think you will see the reverse repos decline as the Fed’s total assets decline through the year. That will effectively neutralize any overall tightening from the anticipated Fed balance sheet runoff.

Talk of Quantitative Tightening is a magician sleight of hand to make the Fed look like THEY REALLY CARE ABOUT CURTAILING INFLATION. They are trying to FOOL MOST OF THE PEOPLE. The estimate for a runoff in debt maturities on the Fed’s balance sheet is about 4% or $355-380 billion.  That’s neutral for the economy and inflation. 

The lack of knowledge being spewed about monetary policy and the Fed’s balance sheet is astonishing.  When a note, bill or bond “matures” from the Fed’s portfolio it means nothing for the real economy. Nothing changes, except who printed the latest batch of fiat money.

Now a huge difference would be if the Fed SELLS DEBT (without it being reverse repos)! That would be REAL TIGHTENING, because money used to buy those bonds would be removed from the financial system.  

As the Richard Cookson wrote in Bloomberg, “Central bank assets will stop growing this year, undermining a major source of support for all types of bonds. But if inflation remains persistently high, central banks won’t simply be able to let their assets roll off as they mature, as most assume. They will have to start selling them. That is the big problem.”

Money Supply and Inflation:

In a fascinating display of dishonesty, neither Jay Powell nor anyone else I’ve recently listened to ever mentions money supply anymore as a reason for inflation.  Jay Powell has not said he would decrease the money supply as Paul Volker did in November 1979.  Yet it is a fact that “Inflation is always a monetary phenomenon.”

For those of you who never heard Milton Friedman speak, please listen to a talk he gave in the late 1970’s: “Milton Friedman Speaks: Money and Inflation (B1230) - Full Video.” The first 15 minutes is all you need to hear. Friedman proves, using six different countries in different times, that the quantity of money printed, and prices are perfectly correlated.                                                                           

“There is never in history been an inflation that was not accompanied by an extremely rapid increase in the quantity of money.  There has never been in history an increase in the rapid quantity of money that has not been accompanied by inflation.” Never is a very long time!

Conclusions:

The key political goal of the Fed is not to cause a recession, but make it look as if they are fighting inflation.

With Joe Biden’s approval numbers in the tank (see below),  a recession and crash in the markets would end power for the Democratic Party for a very long time!

The FOMC policy is one of delaying the stopping of QE, jaw boning that “interest rate increases” are coming without any plan or details. The Fed wants to retain total flexibility and obfuscation. They know that YoY the CPI will decline in the next four months (from its current high of 7%) and the economy will slow.  Therefore, very few rate increases will be needed before the mid-term elections. The Fed’s hidden agenda is to stall any real inflation medicine if possible.

However, if the banks are correct and Fed increases rates four or more times, expect a major Bear Market and a recession/depression.

If the Fed is bluffing, expect another strong leg up as forecast by contrarian David Hunter, who expects an “epic melt-up” followed by a monumental decline after that.

Closing Cartoon:

Does the figure below look like Jay Powell to you?

A picture containing clipart

Description automatically generated

End Quotes:

Keep in mind the words of the man dubbed “the Maestro,” who demonstrated how the Fed PUT should be executed and how to do it using smoke and mirrors.

“The number one problem in today's generation and economy is the lack of financial literacy.”

“If you think you understand what I am saying ,you do not understand what I am saying.”                    

    Alan Greenspan

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Stay healthy, enjoy life, success, good luck, and best wishes.  Till next time....

The Curmudgeon
ajwdct@gmail.com

Follow the Curmudgeon on Twitter @ajwdct247

Curmudgeon is a retired investment professional.  He has been involved in financial markets since 1968 (yes, he cut his teeth on the 1968-1974 bear market), became an SEC Registered Investment Advisor in 1995, and received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation from AIMR (now CFA Institute) in 1996.  He managed hedged equity and alternative (non-correlated) investment accounts for clients from 1992-2005.

Victor Sperandeo is a historian, economist and financial innovator who has re-invented himself and the companies he's owned (since 1971) to profit in the ever changing and arcane world of markets, economies and government policies.  Victor started his Wall Street career in 1966 and began trading for a living in 1968. As President and CEO of Alpha Financial Technologies LLC, Sperandeo oversees the firm's research and development platform, which is used to create innovative solutions for different futures markets, risk parameters and other factors.

Copyright © 2022 by the Curmudgeon and Marc Sexton. All rights reserved.

Readers are PROHIBITED from duplicating, copying, or reproducing article(s) written by The Curmudgeon and Victor Sperandeo without providing the URL of the original posted article(s).