Global Liquidity Supernova; Oil Price Rise vs. Equities, VIX, Inflation Persists

By the Curmudgeon with Victor Sperandeo



Lots of keen insights from BoA Research this week.  Also, disconnect between rising stock prices and slower growth economy; contrarian investing, VIX at 18 month low, Paul Tudor Jones and Victor on inflation.  Much more...

BoA Global Research: 1,000 rate cuts since Lehman Bankruptcy:

Turkey's interest rate cut this week marks the 1000th central bank rate cut since Lehman bankruptcy (Sept 2008) …That's 1 rate cut every 3 trading days since 2008.  It’s a liquidity supernova ($23tn of central bank asset purchases – see Chart below). It all ends next year.

Central Bank Asset Purchases from 2006:

Chart, histogram

Description automatically generated
Source: BoA Global Investment Strategy, Bloomberg

Oil Price Increase is a Headwind for Stocks:

WTI oil has risen 73% this year to >$80/bbl, a 7-year high, and BoA commodities team expects Brent to clear $100/bbl if we get a cold winter. Higher oil prices used to be a positive for earnings - every 10% rise in oil translated into a 5% increase to S&P 500 EPS. Higher oil not only helped oil producers, but also led to increased capex, benefitting Oil Services, Industrials, and their derivatives (jobs growth, etc.).  But it is different this time! Today's spike in energy prices represents a headwind, not a tailwind for equities. Here's why:

1) Shrinking size of energy beneficiaries: Last time oil was above $100/bbl was during 2011-14. Back then, oil beneficiaries (Energy, select Industrials, Chemicals) represented 20%+ of total S&P 500 earnings. Today, that number is just 6%.

2) U.S. E&Ps' capital discipline: The rig count remains >50% below the prior peak. At $80/bbl oil, our Oil Services analysts expect +22% in 2022 E&P capex, but 23% below 2018 levels. This translates to less revenue for energy capex beneficiaries and a lower earnings multiplier from higher oil. Energy earnings will also be driven mostly by higher prices, rather than price + volume.

3) Shale industry has matured: During the shale revolution, Oil & Gas capex represented ~6% of total private capex in the US, and Oil & Gas construction drove >1/3 of total private non-residential construction, with significant investments on pipelines, refineries, LNG terminals, etc. But that infrastructure has now been built.

4) Supply-led oil rally = negative: Narrowing crack spreads and rising oil prices suggest a supply-driven oil spike. Historically, supply-led oil spikes have had an inverse relationship with the S&P 500 (-27% corr.) vs. Demand-led (+29%).

5) ESG (Environmental Social Governance): Energy has been starved of capital amid the rise of ESG investing: High Scope 1 emissions make it hard to own, and all regional ESG funds are most underweight Energy (see ESG note on Energy). Less capital means less capex, and ESG investor demands further complicate the capex decision making process, leading to more selective capex, less supply, and less revenue for energy capex beneficiaries.

Higher oil prices mainly driven by supply (as proxied by narrowing crack spread) have had negative impacts on the S&P 500 (-27% correlation), whereas high oil prices mainly driven by demand (as proxied by widening crack spread) have had positive impacts on the S&P 500 (+29% correlation). The crack spread has narrowed by 2.2% over the past two quarters, indicating that the recent rally in oil prices has been more supply driven. Thus, a further rally in oil will likely be a headwind for the S&P 500.

Supply-driven oil spike = Headwind for S&P 500

The chart below shows the correlation between S&P 500 Quarter over Quarter (QoQ) return and WTI QoQ price change when higher oil prices are led by supply (narrowing crack spread) vs. demand (widening crack spread), March 1986 to September 2021.  When higher oil prices were due to supply shortages, the S&P declined 27%.  When increased demand drove oil prices higher, the S&P increased 29%.  Victor argues below that supply of oil and gas is being curtailed by the Biden administration’s Clean Energy policies. Do you think this year’s oil price increase was due to supply or demand?



Description automatically generated

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration FactSet, BofA US Equity & Quant Strategy


The Tale of the Tape: liquidity at record high, bitcoin at record high, stocks (S&P 500, DJI) at record high, labor market quits rate at record high, consumer confidence down (see Chart below), wage growth plans at record high, bond allocations at record lows for institutions (net -80% in BofA FMS), for private client (17.5% at BofA GWIM), and for US households (19% - lowest since 1984).

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated


Scores on the Doors: YTD bitcoin up 122.9%, oil 72.9%, commodities 52.8%, stocks 16.7%, US$ 4.0%, HY bonds 1.7%, cash 0.0%, IG bonds -2.8%, gold -5.9%, government bonds -6.4%.


Not all fourth quarters are bullish for stocks as per this table:

The negative SPX Q4's since 1978.  Normally associated with credit wobbles:





High yield

Black Monday




Orange County/ Mexico Peso crisis




Dotcom bubble pops












European debt crisis




Fed policy mistake




Source: BofA Global Investment Strategy, Bloomberg


Tweet by Liz Ann Sonders:

Latest fund manager survey from @BankofAmerica ⁩ shows massive disconnect between  investors’ allocation to stocks (dark blue) and expectations of stronger economy (light blue) … economic optimism has fallen sharply while equities are still mostly loved.


Description automatically generated

FT - Against the herd: trader Mark Spitznagel on contrarian investing

“It’s a terrible time for equity investing. It’s the worst time for this generation,” says Mark Spitznagel. “It’s very, very similar” to 2007, he says, although credit spreads and equity and bond valuations “are far more stretched today; NFTs [non-fungible tokens for digital assets] would have been laughed away in 2007.”

Much of the blame, he says, can be heaped squarely on central banks, which “are acting like it’s an emergency, despite [asset] valuations.” Spitznagel points to the rescue in the late 1980s of Continental Illinois National Bank, which he says was the start of the “too big to fail” policy. The idea that the Fed would provide a backstop against crises “let more and more irresponsibility happen. Investing is no longer about having to think about systemic risks in that way.”

Mark is careful not to say when a crash might happen but insists there must come a time “when you can’t take on more debt”. He adds: “It’s a very strong view I have. What has happened in the past decades is...  laying the groundwork for the next crash.”


Sentiment Trader - VIX at New Low:

The Volatility Index (VIX) closed at a new 18-month low as the S&P 500 closed at a new multi-year high on Thursday, October 21st. The 18-month low in the VIX Index represents the first occurrence since November 2017.  Of course, low volatility indicates extreme complacency, i.e., risk is a thing of the past?

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated
Paul Tudor Jones says inflation could be worse than feared:

“I think to me the No. 1 issue facing Main Street investors is inflation, and it’s pretty clear to me that inflation is not transitory,” Jones said Wednesday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “It’s probably the single biggest threat to certainly financial markets and I think to society just in general.”

Jones said the trillions of dollars in fiscal and monetary stimulus is the impetus for inflation to run hotter for longer. To rescue the economy from the Covid-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve has added more than $4 trillion to its balance sheet through its open-ended quantitative easing program, while the U.S. government has unleashed over $5 trillion in fiscal stimulus.

Inflation can be much worse than what we fear. We have the demand side of the equation ... and that is $3.5 trillion greater than what it normally would have ... just sitting in liquid deposits,” Jones said. “They can go into stocks, or crypto, or real state, or be consumed, so that’s a huge amount of dry powder just sitting waiting to be utilized at some point, which is why inflation is not going away.”

“You don’t want to own fixed income,” Jones said. “You do not want to hold that whatsoever because what they’re saying, what they’re telling you by their actions, is that they’re going to be slow and late to fight inflation and somewhere down the road, somebody will have to come in ... and put the hammer down.”

Victor on Inflation:

If U.S. federal government spending/ $T+ budget deficits and Fed debt monetization continues, it’s safe to assume that there will be further (high) price increases.  That’s because “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” as per Milton Freedman and numerous Fed rounds of QE has caused stupendous increases in money (e.g., bank reserves, monetary base, M1, and M2). 

Therefore, inflation will NOT be “transitory,” as long as the U.S. creates large budget deficits financed mostly by the Fed.  Let’s look at the evidence:

In other words, the huge Fed stimulated increase in the money supply (INFLATION) over the last few years caused retail prices to dramatically increase.  Contrast that to the period before 2018 where more normal money supply increases caused much lower price increases of 1.54% from 2011-2018 (using CPI headline non-seasonally adjusted calculations).

We see that U.S. government spending, funded by printed money (Fed QE “keystroke entries”), causes more money to circulate.  Therefore, food and gas prices go up as does everything else. In my opinion, these prices increases have little to do with supply chain shortages or the demand for goods and services.


Victor’s Conclusions:

The Fed has done a masterful propaganda job to deflect the truth: that inflation is actually a monetary phenomenon caused by the creation of more money (aka QE or “keystroke entries”). While supply chain shortages may contribute to rising prices of finished goods, it is not the root cause of inflation.

If the U.S. government continues to spend money, well beyond the collection of taxes, then the resulting price increases will NOT BE TRANSITORY!  This is the reality of correctly defining what you’re talking about (e.g., that inflation is a monetary phenomenon via the creation of new money).  Prices of everything are going up, just at different rates of increase.

Specifically, energy prices will continue to rise due to the U.S. government’s policy to curtail (so called) climate change. That will cause lower supplies of oil and gas, which will add to price increases as virtually everything is made and distributed using fossil fuels. 

As we noted in last week’s Curmudgeon blog post, green energy (wind, hydro, and solar energy) only accounts for about 20% of electricity generation and a smaller percentage for the production and distribution of goods and services.

Lastly, it should be noted that the highest U.S. Treasury yields for this year were reached on October 21st: 5-year T note=1.23% vs 0.36 on 12/31/20; 10-year T note=2.13% vs 0.92% 12/31/20.  That might be due to Fed Chairman Powell’s speech the next day where he said that it is difficult to predict when the ongoing supply-chain issues will ease. As a result, Powell could see the case for inflation remaining high for a longer period of time. Please refer to: Equities Sell Off as Fed Chair Powell Sees High Inflation Lasting Into 2022.

Prices rises can’t be ignored and will sooner or later put pressure on politicians and the Fed to be more disciplined in their respective fiscal and monetary policies.

End Quote:

Money printing is about redistribution - "Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state lives at the expense of everyone."

A person in a suit

Description automatically generated with low confidence
Frederick Bastiat was a French economist, writer, and a prominent member of the French Liberal School.    

Stay healthy, enjoy life, success, good luck and till next time….

The Curmudgeon

Follow the Curmudgeon on Twitter @ajwdct247

Curmudgeon is a retired investment professional.  He has been involved in financial markets since 1968 (yes, he cut his teeth on the 1968-1974 bear market), became an SEC Registered Investment Advisor in 1995, and received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation from AIMR (now CFA Institute) in 1996.  He managed hedged equity and alternative (non-correlated) investment accounts for clients from 1992-2005.

Victor Sperandeo is a historian, economist and financial innovator who has re-invented himself and the companies he's owned (since 1971) to profit in the ever changing and arcane world of markets, economies and government policies.  Victor started his Wall Street career in 1966 and began trading for a living in 1968. As President and CEO of Alpha Financial Technologies LLC, Sperandeo oversees the firm's research and development platform, which is used to create innovative solutions for different futures markets, risk parameters and other factors.

Copyright © 2021 by the Curmudgeon and Marc Sexton. All rights reserved.

Readers are PROHIBITED from duplicating, copying, or reproducing article(s) written by The Curmudgeon and Victor Sperandeo without providing the URL of the original posted article(s).