Misleading BLS Jobs Report, Labor, Fiscal, and Market Outlook

By Victor Sperandeo with the Curmudgeon

 

Introduction:

The BLS July 2026 Non-Farm Payroll report was the week’s principal macroeconomic development. From an investment perspective, the core issue is whether headline labor data accurately captures the underlying direction of household income, consumption, and economic growth. 

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Curmudgeon Note: Coordinated U.S. - Japan government intervention in foreign-exchange markets propped up the Yen this week, which is discussed near the end of this blog post.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Consumer spending represents roughly 70% of U.S. GDP. Consequently, sustained deterioration in employment and labor-force income would have direct implications for consumption, corporate revenues, credit performance, and nominal GDP growth. While policymakers and much of the financial media continue to characterize the labor market as resilient, the non-seasonally adjusted employment data, revisions, and estimated components of the payroll series warrant tell another story.

Analysis of the (Misleading) Jobs Report:

The BLS reported July payroll figure was a decline of -23,000 jobs, versus consensus expectations that ranged from gains of approximately 65,000 to 140,000. In addition, May and June payrolls were revised lower by 66,000 and 37,000 jobs, respectively. These downward revisions materially weaken the apparent momentum in U.S. employment creation.

For the first seven months of 2026, seasonally adjusted payrolls increased by 426,000. However, the corresponding non-seasonally adjusted total reportedly declined by 709,000. Further, the Birth-Death Model (BDM)—which imputes employment from business formation and closures—accounted for an estimated 774,000 jobs during the same period. If correct, that BDM estimate exceeds the entire seasonally adjusted payroll gain, underscoring the extent to which reported employment growth may depend on statistical modeling rather than directly observed payroll expansion.

The inescapable conclusion is that U.S. employment conditions are materially weaker than the headline figures suggest.  Victor opines that the U.S. employment market is in shambles! Of course, the U.S. government won’t say that as they claim, “the U.S. has a strong jobs market.”  Yet the non-seasonally adjusted jobs data and the BDM show a totally different picture as noted above.

This dichotomy is reminiscent of the George Orwell 1984 quote, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

Meaning: The Party (government) aims to eliminate objective truth, replacing it with whatever narrative the state dictates at any given moment.  It demands total control over reality. They want citizens to believe whatever the government says, even if it directly contradicts what people can see and hear (and feel) for themselves.

The reported 4.1% unemployment rate should also be interpreted cautiously. A declining labor-force participation rate (now at a multi-year low of 61.4%) can reduce the measured unemployment rate because individuals who stop actively seeking work are no longer counted as unemployed. Broader measures of labor underutilization and participation may therefore offer a more complete view of economic slack than the headline unemployment rate alone.

ΰMarkets should focus less on the reported unemployment rate and more on payroll revisions, labor-force participation, hours worked, real wage growth, consumer-credit trends, and the composition of employment gains.

Consumption and U.S. Fiscal Support:

The economy currently appears to be supported disproportionately by three forces:

1.     Astronomical capital expenditure (capex) associated with the buildout of AI infrastructure, data centers, GPU/CPU semiconductors, and especially high bandwidth memory chips.

2.     Continued large-scale U.S. government deficit spending.

3.     Consumption by higher-income households with substantial financial-asset exposure.

The broader consumer appears increasingly constrained. Household spending growth is concentrated in necessities, while revolving consumer credit has become a more important financing mechanism for discretionary spending. With credit-card interest rates near historically elevated levels, additional debt-financed consumption is unlikely to be a durable foundation for economic expansion.

This creates an increasingly bifurcated economy: higher-income households benefit from equity appreciation and asset ownership, while lower- and middle-income households face higher borrowing costs, limited real-income growth, and reduced capacity to absorb additional expenses. A meaningful equity-market decline could therefore produce a disproportionately negative economic (reverse wealth) effect by weakening the spending capacity of the top decile of the population, which has become an important marginal source of consumption.

Fiscal Risk:

Employment weakness has important fiscal consequences. Slower job creation reduces wage income, consumer spending, and tax receipts, while increasing the probability of higher transfer payments and further fiscal support. At the same time, federal spending continues to exceed revenue collection by a substantial daily margin, reinforcing the longer-term trajectory of rising public debt.

The essential macroeconomic concern is that the U.S. heavily relies on deficit spending and capital-intensive AI investment to offset weakness in labor-driven consumption. This can sustain reported GDP in the near term, but it does not create broad-based household income growth or a self-sustaining expansion.

Without durable employment growth, the medium-term outlook for consumer services, corporate earnings, and tax receipts becomes increasingly vulnerable. The central financial-market question is not whether deficits can support nominal growth today, but whether debt issuance, rising interest expense, and slowing private-sector job creation can coexist without eventually impairing confidence in U.S. fiscal policy and the Treasury market.

Gold, Currency, and Interest Rates:

Victor’s previously recommended 5%–10% long allocation to Gold received an additional catalyst beginning around June 25th. U.S. Dollar weakness and yen appreciation contributed to renewed demand for Gold and Silver. If intervention-related currency transactions (more below) involve selling U.S. dollars—directly or indirectly through cross-currency transactions—the result can reinforce concerns about dollar purchasing power and increase demand for monetary hedges. Indeed, Gold and Silver rallied as the dollar declined on four of five trading days during the week.

The relatively muted response in long-dated bonds is notable. It may indicate that fixed-income investors remain uncertain whether fiscal deterioration will produce higher inflation, weaker growth, further monetary accommodation, or some combination of all three.

In fact, the yield on both the 10-year and 30-year U.S. Treasury’s have been trending higher over the last 52 weeks (YoY): the 10-year T-Note went from 3.92% to 4.66%, while the 30-year T-Bond from 4.65% to 5.21%.  That has resulted in paper losses for investors who bought those securities (or the equivalent ETFs) during the past year.

U.S. Stocks vs Bonds:

Over the past five years, the performance disparity between U.S. equities and long-duration Treasury securities has been extremely severe as per this table:

Asset proxy

Approximate price return

Investment implication

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)

+73.41%

Equity investors were rewarded for owning risk assets

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)

-44.29%

Long-duration Treasury holders experienced large capital losses

Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV)

-60.35%

The longest-duration exposure was particularly damaging

 

This incredible stock/bond return divergence has encouraged investors to favor equities and hard assets over nominal long-duration debt. That is a potentially destabilizing development because the modern fiat-credit system depends on sustained demand for sovereign bonds. If investors increasingly reject duration risk, Treasury financing costs may rise even if economic growth slows.

Also, the stock market’s increasing dependence on big bets on A.I., running on data centers built with borrowed money, makes that market especially vulnerable. If the cost of borrowing keeps rising along with bond yields, the A.I. trade will become more obviously problematic for most companies relying on debt to finance the buildouts. Investors might become disenchanted with big tech stocks committed to massive AI spending.

Coordinated Intervention to Prop up the Japanese Yen:

The yen’s price action illustrates the potential for rapid currency reversals. The currency reportedly declined about 4.1% over roughly seven months, then recovered approximately 4.4% in only four trading days with coordinated U.S.-Japanese government support.


ΰCurrently, Yen/Dollar= 157.94 vs. 163.73 to 164.00 before the U.S.- Japan intervention.  The mechanism used for this currency intervention is beyond the scope of this article, but it raises the Fed’s balance sheet and adds significant liquidity for financial markets.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Victor sees a similar trajectory reversal for U.S. T-Notes. A comparable repricing in Treasury notes would have significant implications for yields, duration-sensitive assets, mortgage rates, equity valuations, and federal interest expense.

 

Inflation Expectations and Investment View:

The Treasury market does not yet appear to be pricing a major inflation acceleration. Using 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities as a guide, a 10-year TIPS yield near 2.4% and a nominal 10-year Treasury yield near 4.65% imply roughly 2.25% average annual inflation expectations over the coming decade.

That pricing may prove too complacent if fiscal deficits remain elevated, dollar weakness persists, and bond investors demand greater compensation for duration and sovereign-credit risk. Conversely, if employment and consumption deteriorate sharply, disinflationary growth weakness could initially support Treasuries before fiscal and supply concerns reassert themselves.

Conclusions:

For investors, the principal risks are clear: weakening employment, heavily indebted consumers, persistent fiscal deficits, long-duration bond vulnerability, and equity-market dependence on AI capital expenditure and high-income household spending. Gold and selected real assets remain useful portfolio hedges against currency debasement and fiscal instability, while exposure to long-duration nominal bonds should be evaluated carefully in light of their asymmetric risk profile.

End Quote:

“I weep for the liberty of my country when I see at this early day of its successful experiment that corruption has been imputed to many members of the House of Representatives, and the rights of the people have been bartered for promises of office.”

U.S. President Andrew Jackson (from 1829-1837)

ΰJackson’s quote, from ~190 years ago, shows why REPUBLICS always fail, mostly due to corruption of the Representatives and Senators who are (most of the time) bribed for their votes.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Stay healthy and calm. Wishing you success and good luck. Till next time……………


The Curmudgeon
ajwdct@gmail.com

Follow the Curmudgeon on Twitter @ajwdct247

Curmudgeon is a retired investment professional.  He has been involved in financial markets since 1968 (yes, he cut his teeth on the 1968-1974 bear market), became an SEC Registered Investment Advisor in 1995, and received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation from AIMR (now CFA Institute) in 1996.  He managed hedged equity and alternative (non-correlated) investment accounts for clients from 1992-2005.

Victor Sperandeo is a historian, economist and financial innovator who has re-invented himself and the companies he's owned (since 1971) to profit in the ever-changing and arcane world of markets, economies, and government policies.  Victor started his Wall Street career in 1966 and began trading for a living in 1968. As President and CEO of Alpha Financial Technologies LLC, Sperandeo oversees the firm's research and development platform, which is used to create innovative solutions for different futures markets, risk parameters and other factors.

Copyright © 2026 by the Curmudgeon and Marc Sexton. All rights reserved.

Readers are PROHIBITED from duplicating, copying, or reproducing article(s) written by The Curmudgeon and Victor Sperandeo without providing the URL of the original posted article(s).